Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mohamed Safwat vs Matthew Hulme Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Safwat vs Hulme analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Safwat vs Matthew Hulme Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Safwat has won 55.25% of points on his second serve, while Hulme has won 52.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Safwat, in recent form, has won 51.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hulme has won 46.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.31% and 27.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Safwat has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hulme has saved 65.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Safwat has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 50/ 25), with Hulme winning 56.52% (W/L 39/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Safwat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 282/ 155), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36). Hulme has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Safwat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.51% of matches (W/L 38/ 13), where as Hulme has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 36/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Safwat winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Safwat winning 2 and Hulme winning 0. The last match between Safwat and Hulme was at the M25 Sharm ElSheikh, 12-04-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Mohamed Safwat getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Safwat and Hulme have played a deciding set 0 times, with Safwat winning 0 times and Hulme 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Safwat winning 0, and Hulme 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Safwat has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.89 while Hulme has played against players with an average rank of 104.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Safwat has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hulme has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Safwat has converted 40.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hulme has converted 39.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Safwat 1 - 0 Hulme
366
Rank
130
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
836
Rank
836
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
59% (596-411)
Career Total W/L
53% (54-47)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
63% (24-14)
$262,205
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mohamed Safwat | Matthew Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) | 77% (43/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (30/38) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (14/21) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (25/56) | 25% (15/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mohamed Safwat | Matthew Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 63% (24/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (34/23) | 58% (53/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (292/259) | 53% (481/432) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 66% (21/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 100 | 209 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:31:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 161.36 | 108.84 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (879/1596) | 69% (1718/2495) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (624/879) | 71% (1213/1718) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (398/717) | 53% (413/777) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (71/174) | 40% (69/173) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (667/1702) | 35% (859/2450) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (10/3) | 64% (21/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (16/25) | 62% (23/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 39% (7/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 85% (20/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 15% (20/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 39% (18/7) |
Mohamed Safwat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Mohamed Safwat
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
37%
(
15 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Mohamed Safwat
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Lucas Miedler
45%
(
45 of
99)
1st Serve %
42%
(
48 of
114)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
63%
(
34 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Hendrik Jebens
42%
(
41 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
5
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Robin Bertrand
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Vadym Ursu
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Maxim Mrva
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yousef Khamis
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Mohamed Safwat
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
7
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Matthew Hulme
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Michael Shaw
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Fabio Nestola
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Petr Nesterov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Nicolas Ifi
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Safwat Vs Hulme Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
